Hotels A Hotbed For Local Business NAP Consistency Issues

Mr. Bell Speaks On the Telephone

I’ve had occasion recently to be researching the hotel industry as it relates to Local Search Marketing, and something has come to my attention that I thought it would be worthwhile to jot down.

First, all readers must understand that the consistency with which a local business publishes its NAP (name, address, phone number) on the web is widely considered to be critical to rankings. In fact, David Mihm’s recently published Local Search Ranking Factors 2013 cites consistency of structured citations as the 3rd most important factor out of 83 – meaning that it’s extremely important to ensure that you are publishing consistent NAP data everywhere your business is listed on the web.

Now let’s look at hotels – giants in the local search market. When you think of hotel listings, the first directory that’s likely to spring to mind is TripAdvisor.com. TripAdvisor is to lodgings what Yelp is to restaurants, right? So, imagine my surprise, during an investigation of hotel listings in various regions of the U.S., at discovering how many hotels are listing a toll free phone number as their one and only number on their TripAdvisor listings.

I’ll zoom in on The Talbott Hotel in Chicago, IL (though I could have chosen any one of dozens of other hotels in other geographic markets). Here is the NAP on The Talbott Hotel’s TripAdvisor Page:

I haven’t had a recent hotel client and don’t know if the TripAdvisor dashboard currently gives you fields for both a local and a toll free phone number, but in all of the results I looked at, only one phone number was listed on each of the hotel listings in their index. As shown in the above screenshot, The Talbott Hotel is listing a toll free number only.

Why might this be problematic? Because it is generally believed that Big Daddy Google prefers that local area code phone numbers be used as the primary number for all local businesses.

So let’s take a look at Google now. Doing a branded search in the main engine for ‘The Talbott Chicago Il’, we see the following in the main results:

Now we see another single phone number. This time it’s a local one. Google’s various dashboards do allow for a business to list a primary local phone number and a secondary toll free number, but The Talbott apparently hasn’t done so. So, here we have the makings of a NAP consistency issue. TripAdvisor says the number starts 800 and Google says it starts 312.

Personal Trainer Google now puts me through a workout getting into the Google+ Local page for this hotel to double check the published NAP. From my branded search, I can click on the right column map and then click on the review link to get to the + Local page (thanks a whole lot, Google). Here’s what I see, while mopping the perspiration from my frowning brow:

Sure enough, in the mast and elsewhere on the page, only this single local number is published, with no mention of the 800 number listed on TripAdvisor.

Naturally, our next step is to visit the business’ website, to see if things become clearer. It gets a little worse here, actually (sorry Hotel Talbott):

The crucial footer area of the site has been optimized not with both the local and toll free numbers (to make things clear to Google’s bots and to human visitors), but displays a sole toll free VANITY phone number. Business owners may think that vanity phone numbers make it easier for their customers to remember and reach them, but Local SEOs get that far-away, pained look on their faces when the subject arises. Upshot: if you feel you must use a vanity number, use it on a radio or TV ad and put it in your website masthead in image text – not in real, crawlable text in that all-important website footer. And that brings us to our final screenshot:

The webmasters/marketers for this hotel have attempted to get it right by listing both a local and toll free number on the very vital Contact Us page, but there again, we have the vanity 800 number, so the day (and the data) are still cloudy for Google’s bots.

In the end, what we have here is incomplete and confusing phone signals published in various places on the web, making it hard for Google to hang onto a data cluster that makes good, easy sense to them.

If this were an isolated case, I wouldn’t have bothered to blog about it. But do you know how many of the top hotels in Chicago are following this same pattern of listing a single toll free number, instead of a local one, as their primary number on TripAdvisor?

9/20

That’s right. Nearly half of the hotels in this major city have citation consistency issues similar to what I’ve highlighted here, and the same thing is going on in city after city I’ve looked at. It’s a big, big problem.

Why This Problem Was Bound To Arise

Hotels are unique. They are not like the local pizza place or plumbing company in that the majority of people phoning them will be locally located. Hotels serve travelers, meaning that guests are phoning them from all over the planet to make reservations, and it’s only common courtesy to help these people avoid hefty charges for a long distance call. Toll free numbers represent courtesy in the hospitality industry. I understand this, and so should Google, but the fact remains that TripAdvisor is likely one of the key sources to which Google refers to understand hospitality industry data. Inconsistency in TripAdvisor data may create problems with Google.

What can be done about this?

1) Be sure you are listing both your local and toll free numbers in both the footer and contact page of your website.

2) Be sure you are listing both numbers on your Google+ Local page, too, with the local number set as primary and the toll free number set as secondary.

3) Encourage TripAdvisor to allow for the display of both numbers in their main display of core business NAP at the top of their listings. It will be a convenience for everybody, including guests, some of whom may be local people calling to make reservations for visiting relatives.

4) If TripAdvisor (or any other local directory) continues to only display a single number for each business, then you have to make a judgement call. If you feel having the toll free number listed as your primary number on your listing will generate enough calls to outweigh concerns about NAP consistency issues, then you may decide to continue to list it in this way. I can totally understand a decision like this and would be interested in feedback from hotel industry marketers and business owners regarding how they are reaching this decision.

5) Be sure you are listing both phone numbers on every other directory that allows you to do so, with the primary number being local and the secondary one being toll free.

6) If you are using a vanity number, don’t put it in crawlable text on your website. Put it in image text. I’ve never seen any mention of Google being able to translate the letters in a vanity number into numerical digits. Ditto with any form of call tracking number.

Now it’s your turn! What do you think of this advice? Am I suggesting that hotel owners bend too far over backwards to please Google and their handling of the data cluster? Do you have additional tips? Please add them! And, given the recent findings of Local Search Ranking Factors 2013, do you feel that the issue I’ve identified is super serious, sort of serious, or not really a big deal? Do you feel that consistent data in other places can overcome a single toll free number being listed as primary on a TripAdvisor page, or are rankings at stake if this choice is made? I would love to hear your thoughts and discuss this with you!

3 Responses to “Hotels A Hotbed For Local Business NAP Consistency Issues”

  1. on 12 Aug 2013 at 2:56 pm Dennis Brennan

    Great read, thanks and excellent advice for marketer’s in the hospitality space.

    It’s not the one thing we do as Online Marketer’s, it’s all the things over time that make the difference and if the Google gods are involved, do as they suggest and make the crawls as accessible and easy as possible…

  2. on 20 Aug 2013 at 1:25 am Jaspa

    Very interesting indeed.

    I would like to follow this article with a further question.

    I am researching a very similar topic recently and have been unable to find any information eluding to a potential solution. Or even evidence of this being done by other companies.

    I own a website that operates as a platform or “search engine” for sole traders within the driving school industry. With the launch of our new website i am developing a local search strategy where we potentially get each individual business to create a google places account, with their own business name, address, number, and link back to their profile on “our” domain.

    Similar Scenario – The Talbot Hotel linked to Trip Advisor profile rather than own url. (our sole traders don’t have their own websites).

    E.g.

    Main Places Account –
    Linking URL – http://www.domain.com.au
    Title / Name – “domain” driving school

    New Places Account 1 –
    Linking URL – http://www.domain.com.au/“sole trader business name”/
    Title / Name – “Sole Trader Business Name” Driving School.

    My major concern is that google will see different business names directing to our domain and be thrown by the inconsistency of the NAP information. Although we intend to keep NAP consistent from profiles to the corresponding places account.

    What are you thoughts on such a strategy? Do you think it is risky to point different business names to a subfolder page although NAP information corresponds to the places account? Will it be seen as inconsistent and effect our our domain?

    Again, done a lot of research and have not seen any evidence of this strategy being executed.

    Look forward to hearing back.

    Jaspa

  3. on 20 Aug 2013 at 11:14 am admin

    Hi Jaspa,

    I’m happy to answer your question. Each business may only have a single Place Page/+ Local page per business location. No business should have 2 accounts going unless they have two locations. This would be a violation of the Google Places Quality Guidelines. It is also vital that the business name of any business be published identically on all listings/citations.

    It is not in the best interests of most local business owners to use a directory URL as their listed URL on the Google Place/+ Local page. Google wants the most direct possible URL for each business, so unless the business has absolutely no website, they should not be linking to a profile page on a third party directory. They should be linking to a property over which they have the most control: their website.

    I hope this helps answer your questions, Jaspa!

Trackback this Post | Feed on comments to this Post

Leave a Reply