<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Acting Like Merchant Circle With Nearby Places Move</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736</link>
	<description>SEO, Local Search Optimization and Website Design for small web business owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 20:23:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175716</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175716</guid>
		<description>Welcome, Tom!

I hadn&#039;t considered that, but hey, it could happen. One of the issues I&#039;m having with this is that I can already use the local results in organic, as well as the A-J rankings in the top level interface of Maps to see a variety of listings for a given query. Why do these also need to be on the Place Page? What is the added value?

Now, if none of that activity included direct links to websites, the usefulness of Maps would be degraded, in my opinion, but that certainly doesn&#039;t mean it couldn&#039;t happen. It would be a big change, though.

Thanks for stopping by.
Miriam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome, Tom!</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t considered that, but hey, it could happen. One of the issues I&#8217;m having with this is that I can already use the local results in organic, as well as the A-J rankings in the top level interface of Maps to see a variety of listings for a given query. Why do these also need to be on the Place Page? What is the added value?</p>
<p>Now, if none of that activity included direct links to websites, the usefulness of Maps would be degraded, in my opinion, but that certainly doesn&#8217;t mean it couldn&#8217;t happen. It would be a big change, though.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.<br />
Miriam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Crandall</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175572</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Crandall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175572</guid>
		<description>&quot;And now for our next trick...&quot;

I can see Google taking away the ability to link local business listings (in the 7-pack of local business results) directly to an entity&#039;s website, therefore forcing all traffic to a business&#039; place page first.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And now for our next trick&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I can see Google taking away the ability to link local business listings (in the 7-pack of local business results) directly to an entity&#8217;s website, therefore forcing all traffic to a business&#8217; place page first.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 10, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175567</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 10, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175567</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Acting Like Merchant Circle With Nearby Places Move, SEO Igloo Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Acting Like Merchant Circle With Nearby Places Move, SEO Igloo Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175565</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175565</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Dave!
I&#039;m glad you enjoyed this one, and it seems to have expressed the sentiments many people are feeling about this latest Google move. I&#039;m glad to know that!

How are you doing under all that snow, Dave? I&#039;ve been thinking about you in a white world.
Miriam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Dave!<br />
I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed this one, and it seems to have expressed the sentiments many people are feeling about this latest Google move. I&#8217;m glad to know that!</p>
<p>How are you doing under all that snow, Dave? I&#8217;ve been thinking about you in a white world.<br />
Miriam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175564</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175564</guid>
		<description>Greetings, Matthew!

You Said:

&quot;I can’t believe I just referenced Yahoo’s local system to being better than Google’s&quot;

Haha. That does sound funny, but I have always found Yahoo to be more accessible in this regard than Google. From early on, they have been better communicators and Google would do well to take a page from their book.

Part of me agrees with the idea of monetizing, the other part of me says: Google took all of this business info without the permission of business owners; no one should have to pay for them to get it right. That&#039;s their responsibility, having taking this on when no one asked/permitted them to.

I stand with you on Canada getting equal treatment. Canada is sitting there like some huge untapped market. It doesn&#039;t make sense to ignore our friends to the north!

Thanks so much for taking the time to comment here, Matthew.

Miriam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings, Matthew!</p>
<p>You Said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I can’t believe I just referenced Yahoo’s local system to being better than Google’s&#8221;</p>
<p>Haha. That does sound funny, but I have always found Yahoo to be more accessible in this regard than Google. From early on, they have been better communicators and Google would do well to take a page from their book.</p>
<p>Part of me agrees with the idea of monetizing, the other part of me says: Google took all of this business info without the permission of business owners; no one should have to pay for them to get it right. That&#8217;s their responsibility, having taking this on when no one asked/permitted them to.</p>
<p>I stand with you on Canada getting equal treatment. Canada is sitting there like some huge untapped market. It doesn&#8217;t make sense to ignore our friends to the north!</p>
<p>Thanks so much for taking the time to comment here, Matthew.</p>
<p>Miriam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175563</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175563</guid>
		<description>Hello David,

Like you, I think Google does so many things right! It&#039;s painful when they don&#039;t. Google&#039;s whole local business model hangs on the existence of local businesses, and like you say, it just doesn&#039;t make sense to ignore the needs of these vital folks. But we&#039;ve consistently seen Google put SMBs last, and wish that would change.

Thanks for coming by, David!
Miriam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello David,</p>
<p>Like you, I think Google does so many things right! It&#8217;s painful when they don&#8217;t. Google&#8217;s whole local business model hangs on the existence of local businesses, and like you say, it just doesn&#8217;t make sense to ignore the needs of these vital folks. But we&#8217;ve consistently seen Google put SMBs last, and wish that would change.</p>
<p>Thanks for coming by, David!<br />
Miriam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175562</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175562</guid>
		<description>Hi Dev!

You said:
&quot;At the end of the day, I’m not sure if an SMB has much choice but to stick along for the ride with Google&quot;

I totally agree. No one can really afford to ignore or &#039;defy&#039; Google. Doing so would be foolhardy. At the same time, I wish Google&#039;s gigantic market share could be tempered with both more competition from others and more accountability on Google&#039;s part. Google does many things right, but relating to the world of the small business owner isn&#039;t one of them. I&#039;d love to see that change!

It was a pleasure to find your comment here, Dev.
Miriam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dev!</p>
<p>You said:<br />
&#8220;At the end of the day, I’m not sure if an SMB has much choice but to stick along for the ride with Google&#8221;</p>
<p>I totally agree. No one can really afford to ignore or &#8216;defy&#8217; Google. Doing so would be foolhardy. At the same time, I wish Google&#8217;s gigantic market share could be tempered with both more competition from others and more accountability on Google&#8217;s part. Google does many things right, but relating to the world of the small business owner isn&#8217;t one of them. I&#8217;d love to see that change!</p>
<p>It was a pleasure to find your comment here, Dev.<br />
Miriam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175537</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175537</guid>
		<description>Miriam:

Terrific article Miriam.  You have captured much if not all of the issues and problems with this latest approach by Google.  More than that you have captured their hypocracy and mixed messages to businesses.

Wonderful job.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miriam:</p>
<p>Terrific article Miriam.  You have captured much if not all of the issues and problems with this latest approach by Google.  More than that you have captured their hypocracy and mixed messages to businesses.</p>
<p>Wonderful job.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175536</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175536</guid>
		<description>Miriam,

Great post!

I am NOT a fan of the new ads popping up on SMB&#039;s Places Pages.  

What David Mihm said about Yelp realizing that the SMB&#039;s are a large part of their success is true and applies to all platforms including Google Maps.

I wish Google Maps would actually do something to monetize the Maps the way Yahoo Local does.  You have free, enhanced and featured.  Enhanced &amp; featured gives you a chance to show up on their &quot;3-Pack&quot; if optimized right and then they offer a version of what kinda looks like PPC Ads in the Local section above the map listings at a &quot;flat rate&quot; monthly pricing.  Pricing is determined by category of business and city - can range from $20/month to $300/month.  Google could do this type of thing too.

This type of monetization makes sense and still fits into what Google is trying to do.  Also, if they monetize they can maybe create a support center with phone numbers, ticket system, etc.

I find SMB&#039;s would be happy to pay, just so they could get support and answers etc.

I can&#039;t believe I just referenced Yahoo&#039;s local system to being better than Google&#039;s :).  Too bad most of the search volume is all on Google and we are forced to work with what we got!

Oh, while we are all ranting - wish Canada could get more features like US does, we are always forgotten on all 3 search engines. The good news is local maps is available on Google for CND&#039;s and Yahoo &amp; Bing is not - that&#039;s a whole other story though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miriam,</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
<p>I am NOT a fan of the new ads popping up on SMB&#8217;s Places Pages.  </p>
<p>What David Mihm said about Yelp realizing that the SMB&#8217;s are a large part of their success is true and applies to all platforms including Google Maps.</p>
<p>I wish Google Maps would actually do something to monetize the Maps the way Yahoo Local does.  You have free, enhanced and featured.  Enhanced &amp; featured gives you a chance to show up on their &#8220;3-Pack&#8221; if optimized right and then they offer a version of what kinda looks like PPC Ads in the Local section above the map listings at a &#8220;flat rate&#8221; monthly pricing.  Pricing is determined by category of business and city &#8211; can range from $20/month to $300/month.  Google could do this type of thing too.</p>
<p>This type of monetization makes sense and still fits into what Google is trying to do.  Also, if they monetize they can maybe create a support center with phone numbers, ticket system, etc.</p>
<p>I find SMB&#8217;s would be happy to pay, just so they could get support and answers etc.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe I just referenced Yahoo&#8217;s local system to being better than Google&#8217;s <img src='http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Too bad most of the search volume is all on Google and we are forced to work with what we got!</p>
<p>Oh, while we are all ranting &#8211; wish Canada could get more features like US does, we are always forgotten on all 3 search engines. The good news is local maps is available on Google for CND&#8217;s and Yahoo &amp; Bing is not &#8211; that&#8217;s a whole other story though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mihm</title>
		<link>http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736&#038;cpage=1#comment-175521</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mihm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=736#comment-175521</guid>
		<description>Great article, Miriam.  I have to say, I&#039;ve been a big supporter of almost all of the moves Google made in Local in 2009, but this one just makes no sense to me.  Just as Yelp is starting to understand that business owners are every bit as important to their success as users, Google does a big 180.  At least Yelp offers a way to get rid of these &#039;nearby places&#039; via advertising.  A year ago, who woulda thunk that Yelp would be more sympathetic to the plight of business owners than Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Miriam.  I have to say, I&#8217;ve been a big supporter of almost all of the moves Google made in Local in 2009, but this one just makes no sense to me.  Just as Yelp is starting to understand that business owners are every bit as important to their success as users, Google does a big 180.  At least Yelp offers a way to get rid of these &#8216;nearby places&#8217; via advertising.  A year ago, who woulda thunk that Yelp would be more sympathetic to the plight of business owners than Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
